Choose Your Own Utopia

# Freedoms What constitutes freedom is a highly debated question, and few ways of judging this will satisfy everyone. The freedom scores in this interactive story were judged by six factors: * **Individual Autonomy** - Freedom to make personal choices about your life. * **Economic Security** - Guaranteed access to basic needs (food, shelter, healthcare). * **Democratic Participation** - Meaningful say in decisions affecting you. * **Social Equality** - Equal treatment regardless of background/identity. * **Innovation/Progress** - Capacity for technological and social advancement. * **Community Solidarity** - Social connection and mutual support. These were each given a score out of five based on how much or little the freedom was restricted, and these thirty points were divided into ten stars for this article. Of course many people might argue against complete freedom in some areas, seeing it as impractical, if not dangerous according to their own value system. Personally I believe that the ideal utopia would be one that allows for multiple ideals of utopia to co-exist and (if they wish) co-operate together, whilst not restricting anyone from seeking their own ideal as long as it didn't harm anyone else. [[Start over|Start]]

# The Beginning You find yourself amongst 100 others, tasked with building a new society from scratch. The old world has collapsed, and you have a chance to create something completely different. Everyone is looking around, wondering: Who should make the decisions that will shape our future together? * [[Everyone should participate equally with no rulers|Section2]] //You believe every person should have an equal voice in all decisions, with no one person or group having power over others// * [[Elected representatives should make decisions|Section10]] //You prefer choosing trusted people to make decisions on behalf of the community, with regular opportunities to change who represents you// * [[Natural leaders and experts should guide society|Section20]] //You think the most knowledgeable and capable people should be in charge, regardless of whether everyone agrees with them// * [[Traditional or religious authority should lead|Section22]] //You believe established customs, spiritual wisdom, or time-tested ways of doing things should guide how society is organized// * [[Why bother? It's all meaningless anyway|Section23]] //You're skeptical that any form of organization will work well, or that it even matters how society is structured//

# The Democratic Path Representative democracy - the familiar choice! But democracy can mean many different things. How much equality should your democratic society aim for? * [[Economic equality through redistribution|Section11]] //Everyone should end up with roughly the same amount of wealth and resources, even if that means taking from some to give to others// * [[Equal opportunities but accept unequal outcomes|Section14]] //Everyone should get the same chances in life, but it's okay if some people end up richer or more successful than others// * [[Minimal state with maximum markets|Section34]] //Government should do as little as possible and let people freely buy, sell, and compete with each other to solve most problems// * [[National identity matters more than individual choice|Section16]] //What's best for the country and maintaining shared culture should come before what any individual person wants//

# The Socialist Branch Economic equality through democracy - admirable! But who should control the economy to ensure this equality? * [[Worker collectives and local democracy|Section35]] //The people who actually do the work should own and control their workplaces, making decisions together as a community// * [[Democratic government economic planning|Section36]] //Elected officials should coordinate the entire economy to make sure everyone's needs are met fairly// * [[A revolutionary vanguard party is needed|Section18]] //A dedicated group of committed people must lead the transformation, even if others don't understand or agree yet// * [[Gradual reform through existing systems|Section37]] //Work within current institutions to slowly make things more fair, rather than trying to change everything at once// * [[Syndicalist unions should run everything|Section38]] //Organized workers in each industry should take over and run their sectors, coordinating with other worker groups// * [[National workers' unity is most important|Section39]] //All working people in the country should unite first, putting national worker solidarity above other concerns// * [[Spiritual or moral values should guide economic equality|Section13]] //Religious teachings or ethical principles should determine how wealth and resources are shared//

# Mixed Economy Balance You want to balance markets with community - thoughtful! But what's the right balance between these competing values? * [[Community needs should come first|Section11]] //When there's a conflict between what's profitable and what the community needs, the community should always win// * [[Balance public and private ownership equally|Section37]] //Some things should be owned by everyone together, other things by individuals, finding a middle ground between the two// * [[Markets with ethical constraints|Section55]] //Let people buy and sell freely, but have rules to prevent harm and ensure everyone's basic needs are met//

# The Spiritual Socialism Branch You want to combine spiritual wisdom with economic justice - a meaningful approach! But what's the relationship between faith and politics? * [[Religious communities practicing economic sharing|Section35]] //Faith communities should live their values by sharing resources among members, but not impose on others// * [[Democratic institutions guided by moral principles|Section36]] //Government should make decisions using both democratic input and timeless ethical teachings// * [[Religious authority should enforce justice|Section51]] //Spiritual leaders who understand divine will should have the power to ensure society follows moral laws// * [[Individual spiritual practice within market systems|Section40]] //People should live by their personal faith while participating in a system where individuals compete and trade//

# The Liberal Branch Equal opportunities with market outcomes - the liberal position! But how much regulation do you think markets need? * [[Strong regulations and a welfare state|Section55]] //Government should actively intervene to protect people from market failures and ensure everyone has basic security// * [[Moderate regulation with market focus|Section40]] //Some rules are needed to prevent abuse, but mostly let people and businesses operate freely// * [[Minimal regulation and maximum freedom|Section34]] //Government should barely interfere at all - people making their own choices will create the best outcomes// * [[Gender equality requires fundamental social restructuring|Section15]] //True fairness between men and women means changing how society organizes work, family, and power relationships//

# The Gender Equality Branch You recognise that true equality means transforming how society organises care, work, and power - radical thinking! But what kind of transformation is needed? * [[Collective responsibility for care work|Section35]] //Society as a whole should share the work of raising children and caring for the elderly, not leave it to individual families// * [[Democratic policies can restructure gender relations|Section36]] //Government programs and laws can create conditions where men and women truly have equal opportunities and treatment// * [[Individual choice and legal equality are sufficient|Section40]] //As long as discrimination is illegal and people can choose their own path, market forces will eventually create fairness// * [[Traditional gender roles provide stability|Section52]] //Men and women naturally have different strengths and roles, and society works better when these differences are honored//

# The Nationalist Branch National identity matters to you - that's a significant choice! But what kind of nation do you envision? * [[Ethnic or cultural nationalism|Section41]] //The country should primarily serve people who share the same ancestry, culture, and traditions// * [[Civic nationalism with strong welfare|Section42]] //Anyone who commits to the country's values can belong, and the nation should take care of all its citizens// * [[Local self-governance matters more than national identity|Section17]] //Communities should control their own affairs rather than being directed by distant national authorities//

# The Scale Question You value local control over distant authority - decentralist thinking! But what scale of organisation can handle modern challenges? * [[Small autonomous communities|Section31]] //Keep things simple with small groups where everyone knows each other and can participate directly in decisions// * [[Regional federations work best|Section32]] //Groups of communities should work together on shared issues while maintaining local control over their own affairs// * [[Global coordination is necessary|Section36]] //Some problems are too big for small communities - we need large-scale coordination to address climate, technology, etc.// * [[Competing local authorities|Section40]] //Let different communities try different approaches and let people choose which ones they prefer to live in//

# The Vanguard Question You've chosen that a revolutionary vanguard party is necessary to lead transformation. Before continuing, consider: ''This path typically benefits:'' Committed revolutionaries, those who share the party's ideology, people seeking rapid social transformation, workers initially (during successful transitions). ''This path may challenge:'' Political dissidents, those who disagree with party decisions, people who value democratic participation, ethnic or religious minorities not aligned with party ideology, intellectuals and independent thinkers. ''Key trade-off:'' Revolutionary effectiveness and ideological consistency vs. democratic participation and pluralism. ''Historical note:'' Vanguard party systems have historically led to one-party states with limited political freedoms, restrictions on dissent, and concentration of power that can become difficult to dismantle even when the original revolutionary goals are achieved. Would you like to [[Reconsider your options|Section11]] Otherwise ... You accept that revolutionary leadership might be necessary - a serious commitment! But what's the end goal of this vanguard party? * [[International permanent revolution|Section43]] //The transformation must spread everywhere - change in one place won't survive unless it spreads globally// * [[Socialism in one country first|Section44]] //Focus on building a successful example in one place first, then let others choose to follow that model// * [[Party rule might be permanent|Section45]] //The complexity of modern society means expert leadership may always be necessary to prevent chaos//

# Revolutionary Leadership You believe a revolutionary party should lead - decisive thinking! But is this temporary or permanent? * [[Temporary until workers can self-organise|Section18]] //Strong leadership is needed during the transition, but should step back once people can manage things themselves// * [[Permanent party control is necessary|Section45]] //Society is too complex for ordinary people to manage - expert guidance will always be needed//

# The Anti-Authority Path You reject the idea of rulers - excellent! But now you face a crucial question about the material basis of your society. A heated debate erupts about property and ownership. What's your instinctive response? * [[Everything essential should be shared collectively|Section3]] //You can keep personal items like clothes and books, but no one should own productive resources like land, factories, or businesses for profit// * [[People should own their own tools and trade their products|Section4]] //Individual ownership of personal property is fine, but you should be able to buy and sell your own labor and trade with others fairly// * [[I support strong private property rights|Section5]] //Individuals should be able to own things exclusively and do whatever they want with their property// * [[Property is theft, but organisation is also oppression|Section6]] //Both ownership and organized society are forms of control - true freedom means rejecting all of it//

# The Expert Leadership Path You've chosen that competent experts should guide society rather than democratic processes. Before continuing, consider: ''This path typically benefits:'' Technical professionals, educated elites, those who value efficiency over participation, people who prefer stability and rational decision-making. ''This path may challenge:'' Working-class communities, those without formal education, people who value democratic participation, cultural and indigenous communities whose knowledge isn't recognized as "expert," anyone whose needs aren't prioritized by expert planners. ''Key trade-off:'' Efficiency and expertise vs. democratic representation and cultural diversity. ''Historical note:'' Expert-led systems often exclude important perspectives, can become disconnected from ordinary people's needs, and may prioritize technical solutions over human values. They can also concentrate power among educated elites. Would you like to [[Reconsider your options|Section1]] Otherwise ... You want competent leadership - practical! But which kind of experts should guide society? * [[Technical and scientific experts|Section46]] //Scientists, engineers, and other technical experts should make decisions based on data and rational analysis// * [[Economic and business leaders know best|Section21]] //People who have proven successful in creating wealth and managing organizations should guide society// * [[Military and security leaders should be in charge|Section47]] //The world is dangerous - military leaders who understand discipline and strategy should be in command//

# Business Leadership You've chosen that successful business leaders should guide society. Before continuing, consider: ''This path typically benefits:'' Wealthy business owners, corporate shareholders, entrepreneurs, those who succeed in competitive markets, consumers (through market efficiency). ''This path may challenge:'' Workers with limited bargaining power, the unemployed, people in regions that aren't profitable, those who can't compete effectively in markets, communities that prioritize values over profit, environmental and social concerns that conflict with business interests. ''Key trade-off:'' Economic efficiency and wealth creation vs. economic equality and social welfare. ''Historical note:'' Business-led governance has historically concentrated wealth and power among economic elites, often at the expense of worker rights, environmental protection, and social services. It can lead to oligarchy or corporate authoritarianism. Would you like to [[Reconsider your options|Section20]] Otherwise ... Business leaders should guide society - market-focused thinking! But what kind of capitalism do you envision? * [[Corporate-state partnership under strong leadership|Section48]] //Big businesses and government should work closely together under powerful leaders to achieve national goals// * [[Wealthy elite democracy|Section49]] //The most successful people should have the most political power, but still compete with each other for influence// * [[Pure market rule by the successful|Section50]] //Let the market determine everything - whoever can make the most money clearly knows how to organize society best//

# Traditional Authority You've chosen to have traditional or religious authority lead society. Before continuing, consider: ''This path typically benefits:'' Those whose beliefs align with the dominant tradition/religion, people seeking clear moral guidance and social stability, communities that value inherited wisdom over individual choice, religious leaders and traditional authorities. ''This path may challenge:'' Religious minorities, atheists, LGBTQ+ individuals, women seeking equality, innovators, those whose lifestyle conflicts with traditional norms, people who prioritize individual freedom over collective conformity, young people with different values than their elders. ''Key trade-off:'' Social stability and moral clarity vs. individual freedom and pluralism. ''Historical note:'' Systems based on traditional/religious authority have historically restricted rights for many groups, particularly women, minorities, and those with non-conforming beliefs or lifestyles. They often resist social progress and can enforce strict social hierarchies. Would you like to [[Reconsider your options|Section1]] Otherwise ... You believe in traditional or religious authority - a time-tested approach! What form should this take? * [[Religious authority to rule|Section51]] //Spiritual leaders who understand divine will should have political power to guide society according to sacred teachings// * [[Established customs should guide society|Section52]] //Follow the wisdom of ancestors and time-tested ways of doing things rather than trying new experiments// * [[Hereditary leadership provides stability|Section53]] //Having leaders chosen by birth rather than politics prevents the chaos and conflict of constantly changing leadership//

# The Nihilist Beginning You've suggested that organizing society might be meaningless. Before continuing, consider: ''This path typically benefits:'' Those who feel oppressed by all social systems, individualists who want complete autonomy, people disillusioned with politics and institutions. ''This path may challenge:'' Children, elderly people, disabled individuals, anyone who depends on social cooperation and institutions for survival, people who find meaning through community and shared purpose, those who need social structures for security and belonging. ''Key trade-off:'' Freedom from social obligations vs. mutual support and collective problem-solving. ''Historical note:'' While critiques of social systems can be valuable, completely rejecting organization typically leads to chaos that harms the most vulnerable members of society. Without some coordination, basic needs like healthcare, education, and infrastructure become difficult to maintain. Would you like to [[Reconsider your options|Section1]] Otherwise ... Why bother indeed? If it's all meaningless, perhaps the question isn't how to organise society, but whether to organise it at all. * [[Continue to explore this path|Section54]]

# Anarcho-Primitivist World You believe technology and civilisation have corrupted human nature. True equality and freedom can only exist in small communities using simple tools, living in harmony with nature. You reject the complexity that creates hierarchy and alienation. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who depend on modern medicine, technology, or urban life to survive and thrive. **Classification:** Left Libertarian Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★☆☆☆ (22/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★☆ (Free but constrained by nature) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Basic needs met, but precarious) - Democratic Participation: ★★★★★ (Small group consensus) - Social Equality: ★★★★★ (Radical equality) - Innovation/Progress: ★☆☆☆☆ (Actively rejects complex tech) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★★ (Intimate community bonds) **Learn More:** [Anarcho-primitivism](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-primitivism) **Real World Examples:** * Some indigenous hunter-gatherer societies * Intentional communities like Twin Oaks (partially) * Amish communities (traditional technology aspects) **Fictional Examples:** * _Ishmael_ by Daniel Quinn * Some depictions in _Avatar_ (2009) - Na'vi society * _Princess Mononoke_ - forest spirits vs industrialisation [[Start over|Start]]

# Anarcho-Communist World You believe in radical equality and mutual aid. From each according to their ability, to each according to their need. No money, no state, no private property - just people freely cooperating to meet everyone's needs. You think humans naturally help each other when freed from competition and hierarchy. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who want individual recognition for their contributions, prefer competition to cooperation, or need personal incentives to be productive. **Classification:** Left Libertarian Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★★★☆ (29/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★★ (No bosses, no state) - Economic Security: ★★★★★ (Needs guaranteed) - Democratic Participation: ★★★★★ (Direct democracy) - Social Equality: ★★★★★ (Radical equality) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Consensus can be slow) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★★ (Mutual aid core principle) **Learn More:** (link: "Anarchist communism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_communism')] **Real World Examples:** * Revolutionary Catalonia (1936-1939) * Paris Commune (1871) * Makhnovia Free Territory (1918-1921) **Fictional Examples:** * The Dispossessed by Ursula K. Le Guin (Anarres) * The Culture series by Iain M. Banks * Star Trek's Federation (post-scarcity aspects) [[Start over|Start]]

# Anarcho-Mutualist World You support a society of independent producers trading fairly with each other. No bosses, no workers - just free people exchanging the products of their labour. Markets can exist without capitalism when everyone owns their own means of production. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those unable to be independent producers due to disability, age, or lack of skills and resources. **Classification:** Left Libertarian Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★☆☆☆ (21/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★☆ (Independent producers) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Depends on your skills/trade) - Democratic Participation: ★★★★☆ (Cooperative decision-making) - Social Equality: ★★★★☆ (Equal exchange, different outcomes) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Gradual, cooperative development) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (Mutual aid networks) **Learn More:** (link: "Mutualism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutualism_(economic_theory)')] **Real World Examples:** * Some worker cooperatives * Mondragon Corporation (Spain) - cooperative aspects **Fictional Examples:** * News from Nowhere by William Morris (aspects) * Some frontier communities in Westerns * Cooperative settlements in Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars trilogy [[Start over|Start]]

# Anarcho-Capitalist (Propertarian) World You believe in absolute property rights and that voluntary cooperation through free markets creates the most prosperous and just society possible. Government is the main source of oppression - remove it and let people trade freely, and you believe that natural charity will handle those in need. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those without capital, property, or marketable skills - including children, the disabled, and the poor. Left-Anarchists will not accept you as an Anarchist either, because they believe capital to be a form of hierarchy. **Classification:** Right Libertarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★☆☆☆☆ (19/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★★ (Maximum personal freedom) - Economic Security: ★★☆☆☆ (Depends on market success) - Democratic Participation: ★★☆☆☆ (Markets, not democracy) - Social Equality: ★★☆☆☆ (Wealth creates hierarchy) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★★ (Market incentives) - Community Solidarity: ★★☆☆☆ (Individual responsibility) **Learn More:** (link: "Anarcho-capitalism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-capitalism')] **Real World Examples:** * Closest: Some free economic zones * Medieval Iceland (disputed) * Early American frontier settlements **Fictional Examples:** * Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson * Jennifer Government by Max Barry * Some cyberpunk corporate states [[Start over|Start]]

# Minarchist World You want the smallest possible government that still maintains basic social order. Just enough state to protect property rights, enforce contracts, and provide a minimal safety net. Everything else should be handled by markets and voluntary association. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who need more support than a minimal safety net provides, including many disabled people and those in economic distress. **Classification:** Right Libertarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★☆☆☆☆ (18/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★★ (Minimal state interference) - Economic Security: ★★☆☆☆ (Basic safety net only) - Democratic Participation: ★★☆☆☆ (Limited government scope) - Social Equality: ★★☆☆☆ (Legal equality, economic inequality) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★☆ (Market-driven with basic rules) - Community Solidarity: ★★☆☆☆ (Voluntary associations) **Learn More:** (link: "Minarchism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night-watchman_state')] **Real World Examples:** * 19th century United States (closer approximation) * Early Swiss Confederation * Some city-states with minimal government **Fictional Examples:** * The Moon is a Harsh Mistress by Robert Heinlein * Early frontier societies in Westerns * Some libertarian sci-fi settlements [[Start over|Start]]

# Egoist Anarchist World You reject all social obligations and moral systems. Each individual should pursue their own desires without regard for abstract principles like justice or equality. True freedom means owing nothing to anyone. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who depend on others for survival, care, or support - especially the vulnerable who cannot compete as individuals. **Classification:** Far-Right Libertarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆ (11/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★★ (Ultimate individual freedom) - Economic Security: ★☆☆☆☆ (Purely individual responsibility) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Rejects collective decisions) - Social Equality: ★☆☆☆☆ (Rejects equality as concept) - Innovation/Progress: ★★☆☆☆ (Individual creativity only) - Community Solidarity: ★☆☆☆☆ (Rejects social obligations) **Learn More:** (link: "Egoist anarchism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egoist_anarchism')] **Real World Examples:** * Some bohemian communities briefly **Fictional Examples:** * The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand (Howard Roark's philosophy) * Fight Club (Tyler Durden's individualism) [[Start over|Start]]

# The Communist Branch You've chosen collective ownership - brilliant! Everyone contributes what they can and takes what they need. But now you're facing questions about technology and scale. Some people want to build complex machinery, others prefer simple living. What do you think? * [[We should reject complex technology and live simply|Section24]] //Return to simple tools and traditional ways of living - modern technology creates too much complexity and hierarchy// * [[Democratic community control over technology choices|Section7]] //The community should vote together on what kinds of technology to develop and use// * [[We need coordination to manage complex society|Section8]] //Modern life is too complicated for individual communities - we need organized systems to coordinate between groups// * [[People will cooperate freely without money or complex organisation|Section25]] //Trust that people will naturally help each other and share resources without needing rules, money, or formal organization//

# Nihilist Anarchist World All systems and ideologies are lies that control people. The only honest response is to destroy everything and see what authentic human relationships emerge from the ruins. Chaos is more honest than false order. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who need stability, security, or predictable social structures to thrive - most people, essentially. **Classification:** Post-Political **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (8/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★★ (Destroy all constraints) - Economic Security: ★☆☆☆☆ (Chaos, no guarantees) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Destroy all systems) - Social Equality: ★☆☆☆☆ (Meaningless concept) - Innovation/Progress: ★☆☆☆☆ (Destroy existing progress) - Community Solidarity: ★☆☆☆☆ (Destroy false unity) **Learn More:** (link: "Nihilism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism')] **Real World Examples:** * Brief periods during revolutionary chaos **Fictional Examples:** * Mad Max films (societal breakdown) * A Clockwork Orange (social chaos) [[Start over|Start]]

# Social Ecologist World You believe in directly democratic communities that make technology choices based on ecological wisdom. Human societies should integrate with natural systems, using appropriate technology controlled by face-to-face democracy. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who benefit from or depend on large-scale industrial technology, global connectivity, or urban amenities. **Classification:** Left Libertarian Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★★☆☆ (25/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★☆ (Freedom within ecological limits) - Economic Security: ★★★★☆ (Community provides needs) - Democratic Participation: ★★★★★ (Direct local democracy) - Social Equality: ★★★★★ (Egalitarian communities) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Appropriate technology only) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★★ (Ecological interdependence) **Learn More:** (link: "Social ecology")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_Bookchin#Social_ecology')] **Real World Examples:** * Intentional ecovillages * Transition Towns movement **Fictional Examples:** * Shire in The Lord of the Rings * Always Coming Home by Ursula K. Le Guin * New York 2140 by Kim Stanley Robinson [[Start over|Start]]

# Democratic Confederalist World You want a federation of democratic councils managing regions cooperatively. Local autonomy combined with coordination for larger issues, with decisions flowing upward from communities rather than downward from states. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who prefer strong central authority, rapid decision-making, or don't want to participate in constant democratic processes. **Classification:** Left Libertarian Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★☆☆☆ (22/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★☆☆ (Community consensus limits) - Economic Security: ★★★★☆ (Regional coordination provides) - Democratic Participation: ★★★★★ (Multi-level democracy) - Social Equality: ★★★★☆ (Strong equality emphasis) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Democratic tech choices) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (Federated solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Democratic confederalism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_confederalism')] **Real World Examples:** * Rojava (Northern Syria) 2012-present * Zapatista communities in Chiapas, Mexico **Fictional Examples:** * The Fifth Sacred Thing by Starhawk * Parable of the Sower/Talents by Octavia Butler (Earthseed communities) [[Start over|Start]]

# Council Communist World Workers' councils should coordinate production and distribution democratically. No parties, no states - just working people organising themselves to meet everyone's needs through direct democracy in workplace and community councils. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Managers, owners, those who prefer representative democracy, or those who don't want workplace decisions made collectively. **Classification:** Left Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★★☆☆ (24/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★☆☆ (Worker collective decisions) - Economic Security: ★★★★★ (Worker councils provide all) - Democratic Participation: ★★★★★ (Workplace democracy) - Social Equality: ★★★★★ (Workers' equality) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Democratic workplace innovation) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★★ (Working class solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Council communism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_communism')] **Real World Examples:** * Hungarian Revolution (1956) - briefly * German Revolution (1918-1919) - worker councils * Some aspects of Yugoslav self-management **Fictional Examples:** * Red Mars by Kim Stanley Robinson (worker cooperatives) * The Lathe of Heaven by Ursula K. Le Guin (aspects) * Worker settlements in The Expanse [[Start over|Start]]

# Neoliberal World Free markets create prosperity and freedom. Government should provide basic infrastructure but otherwise let competition and innovation solve social problems. Individual choice and economic efficiency should guide society. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who cannot compete effectively in markets - the poor, disabled, economically marginalised, or those in regions that markets abandon. **Classification:** Centre-Right **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★☆☆☆☆ (18/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★☆ (Market freedom, some regulation) - Economic Security: ★★☆☆☆ (Market outcomes, minimal safety net) - Democratic Participation: ★★☆☆☆ (Markets more than democracy) - Social Equality: ★★☆☆☆ (Formal equality, substantive inequality) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★★ (Market competition drives innovation) - Community Solidarity: ★★☆☆☆ (Individual market actors) **Learn More:** (link: "Neoliberalism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism')] **Real World Examples:** * United States (1980s-2000s) * United Kingdom under Thatcher * Chile under Pinochet (economically) **Fictional Examples:** * Ready Player One (corporate dystopia) * Elysium (inequality and privatisation) * In Time (market-based society) * Black Mirror episodes [[Start over|Start]]

# Libertarian Socialist World You want worker ownership combined with local democratic control. Cooperatives, communes, and democratic workplaces should replace both capitalism and state socialism. Freedom means democratic control over your own life and work. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who prefer individual entrepreneurship, don't want collective decision-making, or benefit from current property ownership. **Classification:** Left Libertarian Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★★☆☆ (25/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★☆ (Freedom through cooperation) - Economic Security: ★★★★☆ (Worker ownership provides) - Democratic Participation: ★★★★★ (Worker and community democracy) - Social Equality: ★★★★★ (Economic democracy creates equality) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Democratic innovation) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★★ (Cooperative economics) **Learn More:** (link: "Libertarian socialism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism')] **Real World Examples:** * Revolutionary Catalonia (1936-1939) * Paris Commune (1871) * Some early Israeli kibbutzim **Fictional Examples:** * The Dispossessed by Ursula K. Le Guin * Woman on the Edge of Time by Marge Piercy * Walkaway by Cory Doctorow [[Start over|Start]]

# Democratic Socialist World Democratic government should ensure economic equality whilst respecting individual rights. Use democratic institutions to create a planned economy that serves human needs rather than profit, whilst maintaining political freedoms. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who benefit from wealth concentration, prefer market solutions, or worry about democratic planning's efficiency. **Classification:** Centre-Left Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★☆☆☆ (22/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★☆☆ (Democratic limits on individual choice) - Economic Security: ★★★★★ (Democratic planning ensures security) - Democratic Participation: ★★★★☆ (Democratic control of economy) - Social Equality: ★★★★★ (Economic equality through democracy) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Democratic planning of innovation) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (Collective democratic solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Democratic socialism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_socialism')] **Real World Examples:** * Chile under Allende (1970-1973) * Some Nordic countries' earlier periods * Kerala state, India **Fictional Examples:** * Looking Backward by Edward Bellamy * The Ministry for the Future by Kim Stanley Robinson [[Start over|Start]]

# Social Democrat World You support a strong welfare state, regulated capitalism, and democratic government. Markets can be useful but need democratic control to ensure everyone's basic needs are met and inequality doesn't become extreme. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who want either pure market freedom or complete economic equality - it's a compromise that fully satisfies neither. **Classification:** Centre-Left Liberal **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★☆☆☆ (21/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★☆ (Regulated freedom) - Economic Security: ★★★★☆ (Strong safety net) - Democratic Participation: ★★★☆☆ (Representative democracy) - Social Equality: ★★★★☆ (Equality of opportunity) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★☆ (Mixed economy balance) - Community Solidarity: ★★★☆☆ (Welfare state solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Social democracy")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_democracy')] **Real World Examples:** * Nordic countries (Sweden, Norway, Denmark) * Germany post-WWII * Austria **Fictional Examples:** * Modern Scandinavian countries in The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo * The Left Hand of Darkness (Karhide society aspects) * Many near-future optimistic sci-fi societies [[Start over|Start]]

# Syndicalist World Trade unions should take over and run society directly. Workers in each industry should democratically control their workplaces and coordinate with other unions to manage the whole economy without politicians or bosses. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Non-union workers, the unemployed, consumers who want choice over worker solidarity, or those outside the industrial workforce. **Classification:** Left Libertarian Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★☆☆☆ (21/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★☆☆ (Union collective decisions) - Economic Security: ★★★★★ (Unions provide for all workers) - Democratic Participation: ★★★★☆ (Union democracy) - Social Equality: ★★★★☆ (Worker equality, union hierarchy) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Union-directed progress) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★★ (Ultimate worker solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Syndicalism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syndicalism')] **Real World Examples:** * Revolutionary Catalonia (1936-1939) * Early 20th century Argentina (partial) **Fictional Examples:** * The Iron Heel by Jack London (revolutionary aspects) * Worker-controlled factories in Red Mars * Some depictions in The Expanse (Belter cooperatives) [[Start over|Start]]

# Ultra-Nationalist Fascism World You believe in combining protectionist economics with strong national identity, often enforced through authoritarian means. This historically leads to fascism despite initial liberal rhetoric. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Ethnic minorities, immigrants, internationalists, or anyone the regime defines as outside the national community. **Classification:** Far-Right Authoritarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (9/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★☆☆☆☆ (Total state control) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Security for national community) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Authoritarian rule) - Social Equality: ★☆☆☆☆ (Racial hierarchy) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (State-directed for nation) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (Enforced national solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Fascism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism')] **Real World Examples:** * Nazi Germany (1933-1945) * Fascist Italy (1922-1943) * Imperial Japan (1930s-1945) **Fictional Examples:** * The Man in the High Castle by Philip K. Dick * V for Vendetta (Norsefire Britain) * Starship Troopers (film version) [[Start over|Start]]

# The Mutualist Branch Fair exchange between equals - a balanced approach! But now tensions arise between market activity and community solidarity. How do you handle this? * [[Cooperative markets without capitalism|Section26]] //People trade freely with each other, but no one can hire others to work for them or profit from someone else's labor// * [[Some market activity alongside strong communities|Section12]] //Allow buying and selling in some areas while having community cooperation and shared resources in others// * [[Market solutions work for most things|Section14]] //Free trade and competition usually create the best outcomes, with only minimal community intervention when needed// * [[We don't need markets to cooperate|Section25]] //People can share and coordinate without any buying, selling, or formal exchange systems//

# Classical Liberal World Individual rights, limited government, and market economics create the best society. People should be free to make their own choices within a framework of law that protects everyone's equal liberty. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who need more than equal opportunity to succeed - people facing structural disadvantages, discrimination, or economic hardship. **Classification:** Centre-Right **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★☆☆☆☆ (19/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★☆ (Strong individual rights) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Equal opportunity, unequal outcomes) - Democratic Participation: ★★★☆☆ (Constitutional democracy) - Social Equality: ★★★☆☆ (Legal equality only) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★☆ (Market-driven innovation) - Community Solidarity: ★★☆☆☆ (Individual responsibility focus) **Learn More:** (link: "Liberalism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism')] **Real World Examples:** * 19th century Britain * Early United States * 20th century Hong Kong (economic aspects) [[Start over|Start]]

# Ethno-Nationalist World You believe society should be organised around ethnic or cultural identity, often excluding or subordinating other groups. This typically leads toward authoritarian control to enforce cultural conformity. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Ethnic minorities, immigrants, mixed-heritage people, or anyone who doesn't fit the prescribed national identity. **Classification:** Far-Right Authoritarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (10/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★☆☆☆ (Freedom within ethnic bounds) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Security for ethnic in-group) - Democratic Participation: ★★☆☆☆ (Democracy for ethnic group only) - Social Equality: ★☆☆☆☆ (Ethnic hierarchy) - Innovation/Progress: ★★☆☆☆ (Innovation for group advantage) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (Strong in-group solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Ethnic Nationalism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_nationalism')] **Real World Examples:** * Apartheid South Africa * Rhodesia * Israel **Fictional Examples:** * The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood (Gilead) * The Turner Diaries (white nationalist fiction) [[Start over|Start]]

# Social Nationalist World You want a strong welfare state combined with national identity, but within democratic institutions. Think Nordic social democracy with emphasis on national cohesion and shared cultural values. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Recent immigrants, those who don't share the dominant culture, or cosmopolitan internationalists who reject national identity. **Classification:** Centre-Right Nationalist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★☆☆☆☆☆ (16/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★☆☆ (Freedom within national framework) - Economic Security: ★★★★☆ (National welfare state) - Democratic Participation: ★★★☆☆ (Democratic but nationalist) - Social Equality: ★★★☆☆ (Equality for nationals) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (National development focus) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (National solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Syrian Social Nationalist Party")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_Social_Nationalist_Party')] **Real World Examples:** * Nordic countries with strong national identity * Some aspects of Québec nationalism * Singapore (civic nationalism + welfare) **Fictional Examples:** * Some depictions of idealised nation-states * Certain military sci-fi societies * Starship Troopers (book version) [[Start over|Start]]

# Trotskyist World You believe in permanent international revolution led by a vanguard party. Socialist revolution must spread globally to survive, and the party must maintain revolutionary discipline until worldwide socialism is achieved. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who oppose revolutionary change, want local autonomy, or disagree with vanguard party decisions - dissent isn't tolerated during revolution. **Classification:** Authoritarian-Left State Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★☆☆☆☆ (19/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★☆☆☆ (Party discipline during revolution) - Economic Security: ★★★★☆ (Revolutionary state provides) - Democratic Participation: ★★☆☆☆ (Party leads, masses follow) - Social Equality: ★★★★★ (International working class equality) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★☆ (Revolutionary transformation) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★★ (International revolutionary solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Trotskyism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trotskyism')] **Real World Examples:** * Early Soviet Union (Lenin period) * Cuba (early revolutionary period) [[Start over|Start]]

# Marxist-Leninist World You support building socialism in one country through a vanguard party that will eventually wither away. The party guides society through the transition from capitalism to communism, maintaining revolutionary discipline. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who want immediate democracy, oppose party rule, or are deemed class enemies or counter-revolutionaries by the vanguard. **Classification:** Authoritarian-Left Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★☆☆☆☆ (19/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★☆☆☆ (Party guidance of individuals) - Economic Security: ★★★★★ (Socialist state guarantees needs) - Democratic Participation: ★★☆☆☆ (Democratic centralism) - Social Equality: ★★★★☆ (Worker state equality) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★☆ (Planned socialist development) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (Socialist collective solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Marxism–Leninism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxism–Leninism')] **Real World Examples:** * Soviet Union (1917-1991) * East Germany * Cuba * Vietnam **Fictional Examples:** * We by Yevgeny Zamyatin * Anthem by Ayn Rand [[Start over|Start]]

# Stalinist Authoritarian World You believe a revolutionary party must maintain permanent control to protect socialist gains. The complexity of modern society requires expert leadership that cannot be left to democratic processes. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who want democratic participation, oppose party ideology, or are identified as threats to party rule - which can be quite broad. **Classification:** Left Authoritarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆ (13/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★☆☆☆☆ (Party controls individual life) - Economic Security: ★★★★☆ (Party provides for loyal citizens) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Party rule, no dissent) - Social Equality: ★★★☆☆ (Party hierarchy, mass equality) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Party-directed progress) - Community Solidarity: ★★★☆☆ (Enforced party solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Stalinism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalinism')] **Real World Examples:** * Stalin's Soviet Union * North Korea * Cambodia under Khmer Rouge **Fictional Examples:** * 1984 by George Orwell (Big Brother state) * Animal Farm by George Orwell (post-revolution) * Darkness at Noon by Arthur Koestler [[Start over|Start]]

# Technocracy World Technical experts and scientists should make decisions based on rational analysis rather than political popularity. Complex problems require expertise, not democracy or ideology. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who value democratic participation, cultural wisdom over technical knowledge, or whose needs aren't recognised by technocratic planning. **Classification:** Centre Technocratic **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★☆☆☆☆☆ (16/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★☆☆☆ (Experts decide what's best) - Economic Security: ★★★★☆ (Rational resource allocation) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Expertise over democracy) - Social Equality: ★★★☆☆ (Meritocratic hierarchy) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★★ (Science-driven advancement) - Community Solidarity: ★★☆☆☆ (Efficiency over community) **Learn More:** (link: "Technocracy")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocracy')] **Real World Examples:** * Singapore (partial aspects) * China's current system (elements) * No pure examples **Fictional Examples:** * Brave New World by Aldous Huxley * The Foundation series by Isaac Asimov (psychohistory) * Gattaca (genetic technocracy) * THX 1138 [[Start over|Start]]

# Military Dictatorship World Security and order are the foundations of all other social goods. Military leadership provides the discipline and hierarchy necessary for social stability and national defence. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Pacifists, those who oppose military values, political dissidents, or anyone the military regime sees as a security threat. **Classification:** Right Authoritarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (10/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★☆☆☆☆ (Military discipline for all) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Security through order) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Military command structure) - Social Equality: ★★☆☆☆ (Military hierarchy, order for all) - Innovation/Progress: ★★☆☆☆ (Military-focused development) - Community Solidarity: ★★★☆☆ (Disciplined national unity) **Learn More:** (link: "Military dictatorship")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_dictatorship')] **Real World Examples:** * Chile under Pinochet * Argentina's military junta (1976-1983) * Myanmar under military rule **Fictional Examples:** * Starship Troopers by Robert Heinlein * The Forever War by Joe Haldeman * Ender's Game (military hierarchy) [[Start over|Start]]

# Fascist Corporatism World You support merger of corporate and state power under strong nationalist leadership. Business efficiency combined with state direction and cultural unity creates national strength. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Trade unionists, ethnic minorities, political opponents, internationalists, or anyone who doesn't fit the regime's vision of national unity. **Classification:** Far-Right Authoritarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (10/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★☆☆☆☆ (State controls personal life) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Security for loyal citizens) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Authoritarian rule) - Social Equality: ★☆☆☆☆ (Hierarchical by design) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (State-directed progress) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (Enforced national unity) **Learn More:** (link: "Corporatism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism')] **Real World Examples:** * Mussolini's Italy * Salazar's Portugal * Franco's Spain **Fictional Examples:** * Brazil by Terry Gilliam * RoboCop (OCP corporation) * Blade Runner (Tyrell Corporation) * Wall-E (Buy-N-Large) [[Start over|Start]]

# Oligarchy World You believe society functions best when guided by a wealthy elite who have proven their competence through success. Democratic processes are too chaotic and unreliable for complex decisions. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** The poor, working class, or anyone without wealth and connections - essentially the vast majority of the population. **Classification:** Right Authoritarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (9/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★☆☆☆ (Freedom for elite, control for masses) - Economic Security: ★★☆☆☆ (Elite secure, masses insecure) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Elite democracy only) - Social Equality: ★☆☆☆☆ (Elite rule by design) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Elite-directed innovation) - Community Solidarity: ★★☆☆☆ (Elite solidarity, mass compliance) **Learn More:** (link: "Oligarchy")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy')] **Real World Examples:** * Russia (1990s-present) * Late Stage Capitalist America * Ancient Sparta **Fictional Examples:** * The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins (Capitol elite) * Elysium (space station elite) * Snowpiercer (train class system) [[Start over|Start]]

# The Right-Libertarian Branch Strong property rights it is! But now a moral dilemma emerges: what about vulnerable people who can't provide for themselves? An orphaned child needs food and shelter. What's your response? * [[Voluntary charity should handle social needs|Section27]] //Private individuals and organizations should help those in need out of compassion, without being forced to by government// * [[A minimal safety net is acceptable|Section28]] //Government should provide only the most basic help to prevent people from dying, but nothing more// * [[A strong safety net alongside markets|Section14]] //Free markets work well, but government should ensure everyone has access to healthcare, education, and basic needs//

# Plutocracy World The market should determine political as well as economic outcomes. Those with the most resources have demonstrated their fitness to lead society and should have proportional political power. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Anyone without significant wealth - their political voice becomes proportional to their economic resources, meaning most people have little say. **Classification:** Right Authoritarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (11/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★☆☆ (Freedom proportional to wealth) - Economic Security: ★★☆☆☆ (Security through wealth) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Votes proportional to resources) - Social Equality: ★☆☆☆☆ (Wealth-based hierarchy) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★☆ (Wealth incentivises innovation) - Community Solidarity: ★☆☆☆☆ (Individual wealth accumulation) **Learn More:** (link: "Plutocracy")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracy')] **Real World Examples:** * Gilded Age America * Some aspects of modern inequality * Ancient Rome (late republic) **Fictional Examples:** * In Time (time as currency) * The Great Gatsby (Jazz Age wealth) * Ready Player One (corporate control) * Altered Carbon (wealthy immortals) [[Start over|Start]]

# Theocracy World Religious authority provides the moral foundation necessary for just society. Divine guidance through religious leaders offers wisdom beyond human political systems. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those of different faiths, atheists, religious minorities, or anyone whose lifestyle conflicts with the dominant religious interpretation. **Classification:** Right Authoritarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (10/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★☆☆☆☆ (Religious law controls life) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Religious community provides) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Divine authority, not democracy) - Social Equality: ★★☆☆☆ (Religious hierarchy) - Innovation/Progress: ★★☆☆☆ (Progress within religious bounds) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (Strong religious community) **Learn More:** (link: "Theocracy")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theocracy')] **Real World Examples:** * Iran (1979-present) * Taliban's Afghanistan * Vatican City * Calvinist Geneva **Fictional Examples:** * The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood (Gilead) * A Canticle for Leibowitz by Walter M. Miller Jr. * The Left Behind series * Children of Men (religious authoritarianism) [[Start over|Start]]

# Traditionalist World Established customs and inherited wisdom should guide society rather than abstract theories or individual desires. Traditional hierarchies and roles provide stability and meaning. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who don't fit traditional roles, want social change, or belong to groups historically marginalised by traditional hierarchies. **Classification:** Right Conservative **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (11/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★☆☆☆ (Freedom within traditional roles) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Traditional obligations provide) - Democratic Participation: ★★☆☆☆ (Traditional councils, limited scope) - Social Equality: ★★☆☆☆ (Traditional hierarchy) - Innovation/Progress: ★☆☆☆☆ (Preserve tradition, resist change) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (Strong traditional bonds) **Learn More:** Traditionalism (see conservatism and traditional society concepts) **Real World Examples:** * Pre-modern feudal societies * Some indigenous societies * Bhutan (until recently) **Fictional Examples:** * Game of Thrones (feudal societies) * The Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco * Jane Austen's novels (traditional hierarchy) [[Start over|Start]]

# Monarchist World Hereditary leadership provides stability and continuity that democratic systems cannot match. A monarch above party politics can represent the whole nation's long-term interests. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Republicans, democrats, those who reject hereditary privilege, or anyone the monarchy doesn't represent or actively oppresses. **Classification:** Right Authoritarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (10/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★☆☆☆ (Subject to royal authority) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Royal obligation to subjects) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Royal rule, not democracy) - Social Equality: ★★☆☆☆ (Royal hierarchy) - Innovation/Progress: ★★☆☆☆ (Royal patronage of progress) - Community Solidarity: ★★★☆☆ (Loyalty to crown unifies) **Learn More:** (link: "Monarchism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchism')] **Real World Examples:** * Saudi Arabia * Absolute monarchies (pre-1800s Europe) * Brunei **Fictional Examples:** * Dune by Frank Herbert (imperial houses) * Game of Thrones (various kingdoms) * The Chronicles of Narnia (Aslan's kingdom) [[Start over|Start]]

# Nihilist World All political systems are ultimately arbitrary exercises of power. The honest response is to reject all ideologies and social obligations, living authentically without illusions about justice or meaning. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who need meaning, purpose, social connection, or any form of collective organisation to flourish - which is most human beings. **Classification:** Post-Political **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (8/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★★ (Reject all external authority) - Economic Security: ★☆☆☆☆ (Reject security as meaningful) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Reject participation as illusion) - Social Equality: ★☆☆☆☆ (Reject equality as meaningful) - Innovation/Progress: ★☆☆☆☆ (Reject progress as meaningful) - Community Solidarity: ★☆☆☆☆ (Reject solidarity as illusion) **Learn More:** (link: "Nihilism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism')] **Real World Examples:** * No sustained examples * Brief periods during societal collapse **Fictional Examples:** * The Road by Cormac McCarthy (moral vacuum) * Fight Club (destruction of meaning) * True Detective (cosmic pessimism) [[Start over|Start]]

# Social Liberal World You believe in individual freedom supported by strong institutions. You want regulated markets, robust welfare systems, and protection for vulnerable people, all within a democratic framework that respects individual rights whilst ensuring everyone has genuine opportunities to flourish. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who want either minimal government interference or maximum economic equality - it's a balance that may satisfy neither pure libertarians nor pure socialists. **Classification:** Centre-Left Liberal **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★☆☆☆ (22/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★☆ - Freedom to make personal choices about your life. - Economic Security: ★★★★☆ - Guaranteed access to basic needs (food, shelter, healthcare). - Democratic Participation: ★★★☆☆ - Meaningful say in decisions affecting you. - Social Equality: ★★★★☆ - Equal treatment regardless of background/identity. - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★☆ - Capacity for technological and social advancement. - Community Solidarity: ★★★☆☆ - Social connection and mutual support. **Learn More:** (link: "Liberalism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism')] **Real World Examples:** * Canada * Netherlands * Australia **Fictional Examples:** * The West Wing (idealised American liberalism) * Modern Scandinavian crime novels * Parks and Recreation_ (local government optimism) [[Start over|Start]]

# The Nihilist Branch You reject both property and organisation - interesting! But if you don't believe in organising society, why organise at all? * [[Pure individualism - each person for themselves|Section29]] //Everyone should just look out for themselves with no obligations to others or shared rules// * [[Destroy all systems and see what emerges|Section30]] //Tear down all existing institutions and structures to see what authentic human relationships might develop naturally//

# Democratic Technology Control You want communities to democratically choose their technology - sensible! But what scale of democracy works best for these complex decisions? * [[Small federated communities making their own choices|Section31]] //Keep decisions local - small groups of people who know each other can decide what technology they want to use// * [[Regional democratic councils coordinating|Section32]] //Groups of communities should work together to make technology decisions that affect larger areas// * [[Large-scale democratic planning is needed|Section11]] //Some technology decisions are so big and complex they need coordination across entire countries or continents// * [[Ecological limits should guide all technology choices|Section9]] //Technology decisions should prioritize protecting the natural environment above all other considerations//

# The Coordination Dilemma You recognise that complex society needs coordination - practical thinking! But what kind of coordination preserves your anti-authority values? * [[Democratic councils of workers coordinating|Section33]] //Working people in different industries should organize together to coordinate production and distribution without bosses// * [[A workers' state might be needed temporarily|Section18]] //Create a government run by working people that will organize society during the transition, then dissolve itself// * [[A revolutionary party should provide leadership|Section19]] //A dedicated group of committed people should guide the transformation and maintain revolutionary principles//

# The Green Branch You believe human society must live within ecological limits - wise thinking! But how do we enforce ecological responsibility without destroying freedom? * [[Local communities managing their own ecosystems|Section31]] //Small communities should take care of their local environment and make decisions about land use and resource management// * [[Democratic green planning is needed|Section36]] //Coordinate environmental protection across large areas through democratic institutions and comprehensive planning// * [[Market incentives can solve environmental problems|Section40]] //Use pricing, taxes, and market mechanisms to make environmentally friendly choices more profitable// * [[Strong eco-authority is necessary|Section46]] //Environmental experts should have the power to override other considerations to protect the planet//

# Choosing A Better Future What would a better world look like to you? What would it feature? What would it be free from? What kind of people would be part of it? It can be fun to imagine an ideal vision of the future, and there are probably as many variations of what that looks like as there are people who might try to envision it. Here you will find a series of passages linked by choices that lead to different ideals. It is an imperfect attempt to gauge the kinds of values people have and where those lead as far as political ideologies and their consequences go. You can take this little game as seriously or otherwise as you like. But if you feel I represented any particular side unfairly please let me know what you think I got wrong. My intention is to refine and expand it if others find it interesting or useful. At the very least I hope it gets people thinking, even if they just find it amusing. Click below and on the different choices hereafter to Choose Your Own Utopia: [[Begin your journey|Section1]]