# Freedoms What constitutes freedom is a highly debated question, and few ways of judging this will satisfy everyone. The freedom scores in this interactive story were judged by six factors: * **Individual Autonomy** - Freedom to make personal choices about your life. * **Economic Security** - Guaranteed access to basic needs (food, shelter, healthcare). * **Democratic Participation** - Meaningful say in decisions affecting you. * **Social Equality** - Equal treatment regardless of background/identity. * **Innovation/Progress** - Capacity for technological and social advancement. * **Community Solidarity** - Social connection and mutual support. These were each given a score out of five based on how much or little the freedom was restricted, and these thirty points were divided into ten stars for this article. Of course many people might argue against complete freedom in some areas, seeing it as impractical, if not dangerous according to their own value system. Personally I believe that the ideal utopia would be one that allows for multiple ideals of utopia to co-exist and (if they wish) co-operate together, whilst not restricting anyone from seeking their own ideal as long as it didn't harm anyone else. [[Start over|Start]]# The Beginning You find yourself amongst 100 others, tasked with building a new society from scratch. The old world has collapsed, and you have a chance to create something completely different. Everyone is looking around, wondering: Who should make the decisions that will shape our future together? [[Everyone should participate equally with no rulers|Section2]] [[Elected representatives should make decisions|Section10]] [[Natural leaders and experts should guide society|Section20]] [[Traditional or religious authority should lead|Section22]] [[Why bother? It's all meaningless anyway|Section23]]# The Democratic Path Representative democracy - the familiar choice! But democracy can mean many different things. How much equality should your democratic society aim for? [[Economic equality through redistribution|Section11]] [[Equal opportunities but accept unequal outcomes|Section14]] [[Minimal state with maximum markets|Section34]] [[National identity matters more than individual choice|Section16]]# The Socialist Branch Economic equality through democracy - admirable! But who should control the economy to ensure this equality? [[Worker collectives and local democracy|Section35]] [[Democratic government economic planning|Section36]] [[A revolutionary vanguard party is needed|Section18]] [[Gradual reform through existing systems|Section37]] [[Syndicalist unions should run everything|Section38]] [[National workers' unity is most important|Section39]] [[Spiritual or moral values should guide economic equality|Section13]]# Mixed Economy Balance You want to balance markets with community - thoughtful! But what's the right balance between these competing values? [[Community needs should come first|Section11]] [[Balance public and private ownership equally|Section37]] [[Markets with ethical constraints|Section55]]# The Spiritual Socialism Branch You want to combine spiritual wisdom with economic justice - a meaningful approach! But what's the relationship between faith and politics? [[Religious communities practicing economic sharing|Section35]] [[Democratic institutions guided by moral principles|Section36]] [[Religious authority should enforce justice|Section51]] [[Individual spiritual practice within market systems|Section40]]# The Liberal Branch Equal opportunities with market outcomes - the liberal position! But how much regulation do you think markets need? [[Strong regulations and a welfare state|Section55]] [[Moderate regulation with market focus|Section40]] [[Minimal regulation and maximum freedom|Section34]] [[Gender equality requires fundamental social restructuring|Section15]]# The Gender Equality Branch You recognise that true equality means transforming how society organises care, work, and power - radical thinking! But what kind of transformation is needed? [[Collective responsibility for care work|Section35]] [[Democratic policies can restructure gender relations|Section36]] [[Individual choice and legal equality are sufficient|Section40]] [[Traditional gender roles provide stability|Section52]]# The Nationalist Branch National identity matters to you - that's a significant choice! But what kind of nation do you envision? [[Ethnic or cultural nationalism|Section41]] [[Civic nationalism with strong welfare|Section42]] [[Local self-governance matters more than national identity|Section17]]# The Scale Question You value local control over distant authority - decentralist thinking! But what scale of organisation can handle modern challenges? [[Small autonomous communities|Section31]] [[Regional federations work best|Section32]] [[Global coordination is necessary|Section36]] [[Competing local authorities|Section40]]# The Vanguard Question You accept that revolutionary leadership might be necessary - a serious commitment! But what's the end goal of this vanguard party? [[International permanent revolution|Section43]] [[Socialism in one country first|Section44]] [[Party rule might be permanent|Section45]]# Revolutionary Leadership You believe a revolutionary party should lead - decisive thinking! But is this temporary or permanent? [[Temporary until workers can self-organise|Section18]] [[Permanent party control is necessary|Section45]]# The Anti-Authority Path You reject the idea of rulers - excellent! But now you face a crucial question about the material basis of your society. A heated debate erupts about property and ownership. What's your instinctive response? [[Everything should be shared collectively|Section3]] [[People should have personal possessions but share essential resources|Section4]] [[I support strong private property rights|Section5]] [[Property is theft, but organisation is also oppression|Section6]]# The Expert Leadership Path You want competent leadership - practical! But which kind of experts should guide society? [[Technical and scientific experts|Section46]] [[Economic and business leaders know best|Section21]] [[Military and security leaders should be in charge|Section47]]# Business Leadership Business leaders should guide society - market-focused thinking! But what kind of capitalism do you envision? [[Corporate-state partnership under strong leadership|Section48]] [[Wealthy elite democracy|Section49]] [[Pure market rule by the successful|Section50]]# Traditional Authority You believe in traditional or religious authority - a time-tested approach! What form should this take? [[Religious authority to rule|Section51]] [[Established customs should guide society|Section52]] [[Hereditary leadership provides stability|Section53]]# The Nihilist Beginning Why bother indeed? If it's all meaningless, perhaps the question isn't how to organise society, but whether to organise it at all. [[Continue to explore this path|Section54]]# Anarcho-Primitivist World You believe technology and civilisation have corrupted human nature. True equality and freedom can only exist in small communities using simple tools, living in harmony with nature. You reject the complexity that creates hierarchy and alienation. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who depend on modern medicine, technology, or urban life to survive and thrive. **Classification:** Left Libertarian Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★☆☆☆ (22/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★☆ (Free but constrained by nature) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Basic needs met, but precarious) - Democratic Participation: ★★★★★ (Small group consensus) - Social Equality: ★★★★★ (Radical equality) - Innovation/Progress: ★☆☆☆☆ (Actively rejects complex tech) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★★ (Intimate community bonds) **Learn More:** [Anarcho-primitivism](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-primitivism) **Real World Examples:** * Some indigenous hunter-gatherer societies * Intentional communities like Twin Oaks (partially) * Amish communities (traditional technology aspects) **Fictional Examples:** * _Ishmael_ by Daniel Quinn * Some depictions in _Avatar_ (2009) - Na'vi society * _Princess Mononoke_ - forest spirits vs industrialisation [[Start over|Start]]# Anarcho-Communist World You believe in radical equality and mutual aid. From each according to their ability, to each according to their need. No money, no state, no private property - just people freely cooperating to meet everyone's needs. You think humans naturally help each other when freed from competition and hierarchy. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who want individual recognition for their contributions, prefer competition to cooperation, or need personal incentives to be productive. **Classification:** Left Libertarian Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★★★☆ (29/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★★ (No bosses, no state) - Economic Security: ★★★★★ (Needs guaranteed) - Democratic Participation: ★★★★★ (Direct democracy) - Social Equality: ★★★★★ (Radical equality) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Consensus can be slow) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★★ (Mutual aid core principle) **Learn More:** (link: "Anarchist communism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_communism')] **Real World Examples:** * Revolutionary Catalonia (1936-1939) * Paris Commune (1871) * Makhnovia Free Territory (1918-1921) **Fictional Examples:** * The Dispossessed by Ursula K. Le Guin (Anarres) * The Culture series by Iain M. Banks * Star Trek's Federation (post-scarcity aspects) [[Start over|Start]]# Anarcho-Mutualist World You support a society of independent producers trading fairly with each other. No bosses, no workers - just free people exchanging the products of their labour. Markets can exist without capitalism when everyone owns their own means of production. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those unable to be independent producers due to disability, age, or lack of skills and resources. **Classification:** Left Libertarian Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★☆☆☆ (21/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★☆ (Independent producers) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Depends on your skills/trade) - Democratic Participation: ★★★★☆ (Cooperative decision-making) - Social Equality: ★★★★☆ (Equal exchange, different outcomes) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Gradual, cooperative development) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (Mutual aid networks) **Learn More:** (link: "Mutualism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutualism_(economic_theory)')] **Real World Examples:** * Some worker cooperatives * Mondragon Corporation (Spain) - cooperative aspects **Fictional Examples:** * News from Nowhere by William Morris (aspects) * Some frontier communities in Westerns * Cooperative settlements in Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars trilogy [[Start over|Start]]# Anarcho-Capitalist (Propertarian) World You believe in absolute property rights and that voluntary cooperation through free markets creates the most prosperous and just society possible. Government is the main source of oppression - remove it and let people trade freely, and you believe that natural charity will handle those in need. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those without capital, property, or marketable skills - including children, the disabled, and the poor. Left-Anarchists will not accept you as an Anarchist either, because they believe capital to be a form of hierarchy. **Classification:** Right Libertarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★☆☆☆☆ (19/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★★ (Maximum personal freedom) - Economic Security: ★★☆☆☆ (Depends on market success) - Democratic Participation: ★★☆☆☆ (Markets, not democracy) - Social Equality: ★★☆☆☆ (Wealth creates hierarchy) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★★ (Market incentives) - Community Solidarity: ★★☆☆☆ (Individual responsibility) **Learn More:** (link: "Anarcho-capitalism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-capitalism')] **Real World Examples:** * Closest: Some free economic zones * Medieval Iceland (disputed) * Early American frontier settlements **Fictional Examples:** * Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson * Jennifer Government by Max Barry * Some cyberpunk corporate states [[Start over|Start]]# Minarchist World You want the smallest possible government that still maintains basic social order. Just enough state to protect property rights, enforce contracts, and provide a minimal safety net. Everything else should be handled by markets and voluntary association. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who need more support than a minimal safety net provides, including many disabled people and those in economic distress. **Classification:** Right Libertarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★☆☆☆☆ (18/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★★ (Minimal state interference) - Economic Security: ★★☆☆☆ (Basic safety net only) - Democratic Participation: ★★☆☆☆ (Limited government scope) - Social Equality: ★★☆☆☆ (Legal equality, economic inequality) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★☆ (Market-driven with basic rules) - Community Solidarity: ★★☆☆☆ (Voluntary associations) **Learn More:** (link: "Minarchism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night-watchman_state')] **Real World Examples:** * 19th century United States (closer approximation) * Early Swiss Confederation * Some city-states with minimal government **Fictional Examples:** * The Moon is a Harsh Mistress by Robert Heinlein * Early frontier societies in Westerns * Some libertarian sci-fi settlements [[Start over|Start]]# Egoist Anarchist World You reject all social obligations and moral systems. Each individual should pursue their own desires without regard for abstract principles like justice or equality. True freedom means owing nothing to anyone. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who depend on others for survival, care, or support - especially the vulnerable who cannot compete as individuals. **Classification:** Far-Right Libertarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆ (11/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★★ (Ultimate individual freedom) - Economic Security: ★☆☆☆☆ (Purely individual responsibility) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Rejects collective decisions) - Social Equality: ★☆☆☆☆ (Rejects equality as concept) - Innovation/Progress: ★★☆☆☆ (Individual creativity only) - Community Solidarity: ★☆☆☆☆ (Rejects social obligations) **Learn More:** (link: "Egoist anarchism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egoist_anarchism')] **Real World Examples:** * Some bohemian communities briefly **Fictional Examples:** * The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand (Howard Roark's philosophy) * Fight Club (Tyler Durden's individualism) [[Start over|Start]]# The Communist Branch You've chosen collective ownership - brilliant! Everyone contributes what they can and takes what they need. But now you're facing questions about technology and scale. Some people want to build complex machinery, others prefer simple living. What do you think? [[We should reject complex technology and live simply|Section24]] [[Democratic community control over technology choices|Section7]] [[We need coordination to manage complex society|Section8]] [[People will cooperate freely without money or complex organisation|Section25]]# Nihilist Anarchist World All systems and ideologies are lies that control people. The only honest response is to destroy everything and see what authentic human relationships emerge from the ruins. Chaos is more honest than false order. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who need stability, security, or predictable social structures to thrive - most people, essentially. **Classification:** Post-Political **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (8/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★★ (Destroy all constraints) - Economic Security: ★☆☆☆☆ (Chaos, no guarantees) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Destroy all systems) - Social Equality: ★☆☆☆☆ (Meaningless concept) - Innovation/Progress: ★☆☆☆☆ (Destroy existing progress) - Community Solidarity: ★☆☆☆☆ (Destroy false unity) **Learn More:** (link: "Nihilism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism')] **Real World Examples:** * Brief periods during revolutionary chaos **Fictional Examples:** * Mad Max films (societal breakdown) * A Clockwork Orange (social chaos) [[Start over|Start]]# Social Ecologist World You believe in directly democratic communities that make technology choices based on ecological wisdom. Human societies should integrate with natural systems, using appropriate technology controlled by face-to-face democracy. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who benefit from or depend on large-scale industrial technology, global connectivity, or urban amenities. **Classification:** Left Libertarian Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★★☆☆ (25/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★☆ (Freedom within ecological limits) - Economic Security: ★★★★☆ (Community provides needs) - Democratic Participation: ★★★★★ (Direct local democracy) - Social Equality: ★★★★★ (Egalitarian communities) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Appropriate technology only) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★★ (Ecological interdependence) **Learn More:** (link: "Social ecology")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_Bookchin#Social_ecology')] **Real World Examples:** * Intentional ecovillages * Transition Towns movement **Fictional Examples:** * Shire in The Lord of the Rings * Always Coming Home by Ursula K. Le Guin * New York 2140 by Kim Stanley Robinson [[Start over|Start]]# Democratic Confederalist World You want a federation of democratic councils managing regions cooperatively. Local autonomy combined with coordination for larger issues, with decisions flowing upward from communities rather than downward from states. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who prefer strong central authority, rapid decision-making, or don't want to participate in constant democratic processes. **Classification:** Left Libertarian Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★☆☆☆ (22/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★☆☆ (Community consensus limits) - Economic Security: ★★★★☆ (Regional coordination provides) - Democratic Participation: ★★★★★ (Multi-level democracy) - Social Equality: ★★★★☆ (Strong equality emphasis) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Democratic tech choices) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (Federated solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Democratic confederalism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_confederalism')] **Real World Examples:** * Rojava (Northern Syria) 2012-present * Zapatista communities in Chiapas, Mexico **Fictional Examples:** * The Fifth Sacred Thing by Starhawk * Parable of the Sower/Talents by Octavia Butler (Earthseed communities) [[Start over|Start]]# Council Communist World Workers' councils should coordinate production and distribution democratically. No parties, no states - just working people organising themselves to meet everyone's needs through direct democracy in workplace and community councils. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Managers, owners, those who prefer representative democracy, or those who don't want workplace decisions made collectively. **Classification:** Left Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★★☆☆ (24/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★☆☆ (Worker collective decisions) - Economic Security: ★★★★★ (Worker councils provide all) - Democratic Participation: ★★★★★ (Workplace democracy) - Social Equality: ★★★★★ (Workers' equality) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Democratic workplace innovation) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★★ (Working class solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Council communism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_communism')] **Real World Examples:** * Hungarian Revolution (1956) - briefly * German Revolution (1918-1919) - worker councils * Some aspects of Yugoslav self-management **Fictional Examples:** * Red Mars by Kim Stanley Robinson (worker cooperatives) * The Lathe of Heaven by Ursula K. Le Guin (aspects) * Worker settlements in The Expanse [[Start over|Start]]# Neoliberal World Free markets create prosperity and freedom. Government should provide basic infrastructure but otherwise let competition and innovation solve social problems. Individual choice and economic efficiency should guide society. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who cannot compete effectively in markets - the poor, disabled, economically marginalised, or those in regions that markets abandon. **Classification:** Centre-Right **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★☆☆☆☆ (18/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★☆ (Market freedom, some regulation) - Economic Security: ★★☆☆☆ (Market outcomes, minimal safety net) - Democratic Participation: ★★☆☆☆ (Markets more than democracy) - Social Equality: ★★☆☆☆ (Formal equality, substantive inequality) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★★ (Market competition drives innovation) - Community Solidarity: ★★☆☆☆ (Individual market actors) **Learn More:** (link: "Neoliberalism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism')] **Real World Examples:** * United States (1980s-2000s) * United Kingdom under Thatcher * Chile under Pinochet (economically) **Fictional Examples:** * Ready Player One (corporate dystopia) * Elysium (inequality and privatisation) * In Time (market-based society) * Black Mirror episodes [[Start over|Start]]# Libertarian Socialist World You want worker ownership combined with local democratic control. Cooperatives, communes, and democratic workplaces should replace both capitalism and state socialism. Freedom means democratic control over your own life and work. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who prefer individual entrepreneurship, don't want collective decision-making, or benefit from current property ownership. **Classification:** Left Libertarian Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★★☆☆ (25/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★☆ (Freedom through cooperation) - Economic Security: ★★★★☆ (Worker ownership provides) - Democratic Participation: ★★★★★ (Worker and community democracy) - Social Equality: ★★★★★ (Economic democracy creates equality) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Democratic innovation) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★★ (Cooperative economics) **Learn More:** (link: "Libertarian socialism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism')] **Real World Examples:** * Revolutionary Catalonia (1936-1939) * Paris Commune (1871) * Some early Israeli kibbutzim **Fictional Examples:** * The Dispossessed by Ursula K. Le Guin * Woman on the Edge of Time by Marge Piercy * Walkaway by Cory Doctorow [[Start over|Start]]# Democratic Socialist World Democratic government should ensure economic equality whilst respecting individual rights. Use democratic institutions to create a planned economy that serves human needs rather than profit, whilst maintaining political freedoms. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who benefit from wealth concentration, prefer market solutions, or worry about democratic planning's efficiency. **Classification:** Centre-Left Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★☆☆☆ (22/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★☆☆ (Democratic limits on individual choice) - Economic Security: ★★★★★ (Democratic planning ensures security) - Democratic Participation: ★★★★☆ (Democratic control of economy) - Social Equality: ★★★★★ (Economic equality through democracy) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Democratic planning of innovation) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (Collective democratic solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Democratic socialism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_socialism')] **Real World Examples:** * Chile under Allende (1970-1973) * Some Nordic countries' earlier periods * Kerala state, India **Fictional Examples:** * Looking Backward by Edward Bellamy * The Ministry for the Future by Kim Stanley Robinson [[Start over|Start]]# Social Democrat World You support a strong welfare state, regulated capitalism, and democratic government. Markets can be useful but need democratic control to ensure everyone's basic needs are met and inequality doesn't become extreme. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who want either pure market freedom or complete economic equality - it's a compromise that fully satisfies neither. **Classification:** Centre-Left Liberal **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★☆☆☆ (21/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★☆ (Regulated freedom) - Economic Security: ★★★★☆ (Strong safety net) - Democratic Participation: ★★★☆☆ (Representative democracy) - Social Equality: ★★★★☆ (Equality of opportunity) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★☆ (Mixed economy balance) - Community Solidarity: ★★★☆☆ (Welfare state solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Social democracy")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_democracy')] **Real World Examples:** * Nordic countries (Sweden, Norway, Denmark) * Germany post-WWII * Austria **Fictional Examples:** * Modern Scandinavian countries in The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo * The Left Hand of Darkness (Karhide society aspects) * Many near-future optimistic sci-fi societies [[Start over|Start]]# Syndicalist World Trade unions should take over and run society directly. Workers in each industry should democratically control their workplaces and coordinate with other unions to manage the whole economy without politicians or bosses. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Non-union workers, the unemployed, consumers who want choice over worker solidarity, or those outside the industrial workforce. **Classification:** Left Libertarian Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★☆☆☆ (21/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★☆☆ (Union collective decisions) - Economic Security: ★★★★★ (Unions provide for all workers) - Democratic Participation: ★★★★☆ (Union democracy) - Social Equality: ★★★★☆ (Worker equality, union hierarchy) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Union-directed progress) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★★ (Ultimate worker solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Syndicalism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syndicalism')] **Real World Examples:** * Revolutionary Catalonia (1936-1939) * Early 20th century Argentina (partial) **Fictional Examples:** * The Iron Heel by Jack London (revolutionary aspects) * Worker-controlled factories in Red Mars * Some depictions in The Expanse (Belter cooperatives) [[Start over|Start]]# Ultra-Nationalist Fascism World You believe in combining protectionist economics with strong national identity, often enforced through authoritarian means. This historically leads to fascism despite initial liberal rhetoric. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Ethnic minorities, immigrants, internationalists, or anyone the regime defines as outside the national community. **Classification:** Far-Right Authoritarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (9/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★☆☆☆☆ (Total state control) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Security for national community) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Authoritarian rule) - Social Equality: ★☆☆☆☆ (Racial hierarchy) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (State-directed for nation) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (Enforced national solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Fascism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism')] **Real World Examples:** * Nazi Germany (1933-1945) * Fascist Italy (1922-1943) * Imperial Japan (1930s-1945) **Fictional Examples:** * The Man in the High Castle by Philip K. Dick * V for Vendetta (Norsefire Britain) * Starship Troopers (film version) [[Start over|Start]]# The Mutualist Branch Fair exchange between equals - a balanced approach! But now tensions arise between market activity and community solidarity. How do you handle this? [[Cooperative markets without capitalism|Section26]] [[Some market activity alongside strong communities|Section12]] [[Market solutions work for most things|Section14]] [[We don't need markets to cooperate|Section25]]# Classical Liberal World Individual rights, limited government, and market economics create the best society. People should be free to make their own choices within a framework of law that protects everyone's equal liberty. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who need more than equal opportunity to succeed - people facing structural disadvantages, discrimination, or economic hardship. **Classification:** Centre-Right **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★☆☆☆☆ (19/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★☆ (Strong individual rights) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Equal opportunity, unequal outcomes) - Democratic Participation: ★★★☆☆ (Constitutional democracy) - Social Equality: ★★★☆☆ (Legal equality only) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★☆ (Market-driven innovation) - Community Solidarity: ★★☆☆☆ (Individual responsibility focus) **Learn More:** (link: "Liberalism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism')] **Real World Examples:** * 19th century Britain * Early United States * 20th century Hong Kong (economic aspects) [[Start over|Start]]# Ethno-Nationalist World You believe society should be organised around ethnic or cultural identity, often excluding or subordinating other groups. This typically leads toward authoritarian control to enforce cultural conformity. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Ethnic minorities, immigrants, mixed-heritage people, or anyone who doesn't fit the prescribed national identity. **Classification:** Far-Right Authoritarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (10/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★☆☆☆ (Freedom within ethnic bounds) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Security for ethnic in-group) - Democratic Participation: ★★☆☆☆ (Democracy for ethnic group only) - Social Equality: ★☆☆☆☆ (Ethnic hierarchy) - Innovation/Progress: ★★☆☆☆ (Innovation for group advantage) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (Strong in-group solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Ethnic Nationalism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_nationalism')] **Real World Examples:** * Apartheid South Africa * Rhodesia * Israel **Fictional Examples:** * The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood (Gilead) * The Turner Diaries (white nationalist fiction) [[Start over|Start]]# Social Nationalist World You want a strong welfare state combined with national identity, but within democratic institutions. Think Nordic social democracy with emphasis on national cohesion and shared cultural values. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Recent immigrants, those who don't share the dominant culture, or cosmopolitan internationalists who reject national identity. **Classification:** Centre-Right Nationalist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★☆☆☆☆☆ (16/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★☆☆ (Freedom within national framework) - Economic Security: ★★★★☆ (National welfare state) - Democratic Participation: ★★★☆☆ (Democratic but nationalist) - Social Equality: ★★★☆☆ (Equality for nationals) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (National development focus) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (National solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Syrian Social Nationalist Party")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_Social_Nationalist_Party')] **Real World Examples:** * Nordic countries with strong national identity * Some aspects of Québec nationalism * Singapore (civic nationalism + welfare) **Fictional Examples:** * Some depictions of idealised nation-states * Certain military sci-fi societies * Starship Troopers (book version) [[Start over|Start]]# Trotskyist World You believe in permanent international revolution led by a vanguard party. Socialist revolution must spread globally to survive, and the party must maintain revolutionary discipline until worldwide socialism is achieved. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who oppose revolutionary change, want local autonomy, or disagree with vanguard party decisions - dissent isn't tolerated during revolution. **Classification:** Authoritarian-Left State Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★☆☆☆☆ (19/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★☆☆☆ (Party discipline during revolution) - Economic Security: ★★★★☆ (Revolutionary state provides) - Democratic Participation: ★★☆☆☆ (Party leads, masses follow) - Social Equality: ★★★★★ (International working class equality) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★☆ (Revolutionary transformation) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★★ (International revolutionary solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Trotskyism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trotskyism')] **Real World Examples:** * Early Soviet Union (Lenin period) * Cuba (early revolutionary period) [[Start over|Start]]# Marxist-Leninist World You support building socialism in one country through a vanguard party that will eventually wither away. The party guides society through the transition from capitalism to communism, maintaining revolutionary discipline. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who want immediate democracy, oppose party rule, or are deemed class enemies or counter-revolutionaries by the vanguard. **Classification:** Authoritarian-Left Socialist **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★☆☆☆☆ (19/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★☆☆☆ (Party guidance of individuals) - Economic Security: ★★★★★ (Socialist state guarantees needs) - Democratic Participation: ★★☆☆☆ (Democratic centralism) - Social Equality: ★★★★☆ (Worker state equality) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★☆ (Planned socialist development) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (Socialist collective solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Marxism–Leninism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxism–Leninism')] **Real World Examples:** * Soviet Union (1917-1991) * East Germany * Cuba * Vietnam **Fictional Examples:** * We by Yevgeny Zamyatin * Anthem by Ayn Rand [[Start over|Start]]# Stalinist Authoritarian World You believe a revolutionary party must maintain permanent control to protect socialist gains. The complexity of modern society requires expert leadership that cannot be left to democratic processes. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who want democratic participation, oppose party ideology, or are identified as threats to party rule - which can be quite broad. **Classification:** Left Authoritarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆ (13/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★☆☆☆☆ (Party controls individual life) - Economic Security: ★★★★☆ (Party provides for loyal citizens) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Party rule, no dissent) - Social Equality: ★★★☆☆ (Party hierarchy, mass equality) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Party-directed progress) - Community Solidarity: ★★★☆☆ (Enforced party solidarity) **Learn More:** (link: "Stalinism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalinism')] **Real World Examples:** * Stalin's Soviet Union * North Korea * Cambodia under Khmer Rouge **Fictional Examples:** * 1984 by George Orwell (Big Brother state) * Animal Farm by George Orwell (post-revolution) * Darkness at Noon by Arthur Koestler [[Start over|Start]]# Technocracy World Technical experts and scientists should make decisions based on rational analysis rather than political popularity. Complex problems require expertise, not democracy or ideology. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who value democratic participation, cultural wisdom over technical knowledge, or whose needs aren't recognised by technocratic planning. **Classification:** Centre Technocratic **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★☆☆☆☆☆ (16/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★☆☆☆ (Experts decide what's best) - Economic Security: ★★★★☆ (Rational resource allocation) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Expertise over democracy) - Social Equality: ★★★☆☆ (Meritocratic hierarchy) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★★ (Science-driven advancement) - Community Solidarity: ★★☆☆☆ (Efficiency over community) **Learn More:** (link: "Technocracy")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocracy')] **Real World Examples:** * Singapore (partial aspects) * China's current system (elements) * No pure examples **Fictional Examples:** * Brave New World by Aldous Huxley * The Foundation series by Isaac Asimov (psychohistory) * Gattaca (genetic technocracy) * THX 1138 [[Start over|Start]]# Military Dictatorship World Security and order are the foundations of all other social goods. Military leadership provides the discipline and hierarchy necessary for social stability and national defence. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Pacifists, those who oppose military values, political dissidents, or anyone the military regime sees as a security threat. **Classification:** Right Authoritarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (10/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★☆☆☆☆ (Military discipline for all) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Security through order) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Military command structure) - Social Equality: ★★☆☆☆ (Military hierarchy, order for all) - Innovation/Progress: ★★☆☆☆ (Military-focused development) - Community Solidarity: ★★★☆☆ (Disciplined national unity) **Learn More:** (link: "Military dictatorship")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_dictatorship')] **Real World Examples:** * Chile under Pinochet * Argentina's military junta (1976-1983) * Myanmar under military rule **Fictional Examples:** * Starship Troopers by Robert Heinlein * The Forever War by Joe Haldeman * Ender's Game (military hierarchy) [[Start over|Start]]# Fascist Corporatism World You support merger of corporate and state power under strong nationalist leadership. Business efficiency combined with state direction and cultural unity creates national strength. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Trade unionists, ethnic minorities, political opponents, internationalists, or anyone who doesn't fit the regime's vision of national unity. **Classification:** Far-Right Authoritarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (10/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★☆☆☆☆ (State controls personal life) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Security for loyal citizens) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Authoritarian rule) - Social Equality: ★☆☆☆☆ (Hierarchical by design) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (State-directed progress) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (Enforced national unity) **Learn More:** (link: "Corporatism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism')] **Real World Examples:** * Mussolini's Italy * Salazar's Portugal * Franco's Spain **Fictional Examples:** * Brazil by Terry Gilliam * RoboCop (OCP corporation) * Blade Runner (Tyrell Corporation) * Wall-E (Buy-N-Large) [[Start over|Start]]# Oligarchy World You believe society functions best when guided by a wealthy elite who have proven their competence through success. Democratic processes are too chaotic and unreliable for complex decisions. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** The poor, working class, or anyone without wealth and connections - essentially the vast majority of the population. **Classification:** Right Authoritarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (9/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★☆☆☆ (Freedom for elite, control for masses) - Economic Security: ★★☆☆☆ (Elite secure, masses insecure) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Elite democracy only) - Social Equality: ★☆☆☆☆ (Elite rule by design) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★☆☆ (Elite-directed innovation) - Community Solidarity: ★★☆☆☆ (Elite solidarity, mass compliance) **Learn More:** (link: "Oligarchy")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy')] **Real World Examples:** * Russia (1990s-present) * Late Stage Capitalist America * Ancient Sparta **Fictional Examples:** * The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins (Capitol elite) * Elysium (space station elite) * Snowpiercer (train class system) [[Start over|Start]]# The Right-Libertarian Branch Strong property rights it is! But now a moral dilemma emerges: what about vulnerable people who can't provide for themselves? An orphaned child needs food and shelter. What's your response? [[Voluntary charity should handle social needs|Section27]] [[A minimal safety net is acceptable|Section28]] [[A strong safety net alongside markets|Section14]]# Plutocracy World The market should determine political as well as economic outcomes. Those with the most resources have demonstrated their fitness to lead society and should have proportional political power. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Anyone without significant wealth - their political voice becomes proportional to their economic resources, meaning most people have little say. **Classification:** Right Authoritarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (11/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★☆☆ (Freedom proportional to wealth) - Economic Security: ★★☆☆☆ (Security through wealth) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Votes proportional to resources) - Social Equality: ★☆☆☆☆ (Wealth-based hierarchy) - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★☆ (Wealth incentivises innovation) - Community Solidarity: ★☆☆☆☆ (Individual wealth accumulation) **Learn More:** (link: "Plutocracy")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracy')] **Real World Examples:** * Gilded Age America * Some aspects of modern inequality * Ancient Rome (late republic) **Fictional Examples:** * In Time (time as currency) * The Great Gatsby (Jazz Age wealth) * Ready Player One (corporate control) * Altered Carbon (wealthy immortals) [[Start over|Start]]# Theocracy World Religious authority provides the moral foundation necessary for just society. Divine guidance through religious leaders offers wisdom beyond human political systems. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those of different faiths, atheists, religious minorities, or anyone whose lifestyle conflicts with the dominant religious interpretation. **Classification:** Right Authoritarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (10/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★☆☆☆☆ (Religious law controls life) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Religious community provides) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Divine authority, not democracy) - Social Equality: ★★☆☆☆ (Religious hierarchy) - Innovation/Progress: ★★☆☆☆ (Progress within religious bounds) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (Strong religious community) **Learn More:** (link: "Theocracy")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theocracy')] **Real World Examples:** * Iran (1979-present) * Taliban's Afghanistan * Vatican City * Calvinist Geneva **Fictional Examples:** * The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood (Gilead) * A Canticle for Leibowitz by Walter M. Miller Jr. * The Left Behind series * Children of Men (religious authoritarianism) [[Start over|Start]]# Traditionalist World Established customs and inherited wisdom should guide society rather than abstract theories or individual desires. Traditional hierarchies and roles provide stability and meaning. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who don't fit traditional roles, want social change, or belong to groups historically marginalised by traditional hierarchies. **Classification:** Right Conservative **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (11/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★☆☆☆ (Freedom within traditional roles) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Traditional obligations provide) - Democratic Participation: ★★☆☆☆ (Traditional councils, limited scope) - Social Equality: ★★☆☆☆ (Traditional hierarchy) - Innovation/Progress: ★☆☆☆☆ (Preserve tradition, resist change) - Community Solidarity: ★★★★☆ (Strong traditional bonds) **Learn More:** Traditionalism (see conservatism and traditional society concepts) **Real World Examples:** * Pre-modern feudal societies * Some indigenous societies * Bhutan (until recently) **Fictional Examples:** * Game of Thrones (feudal societies) * The Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco * Jane Austen's novels (traditional hierarchy) [[Start over|Start]]# Monarchist World Hereditary leadership provides stability and continuity that democratic systems cannot match. A monarch above party politics can represent the whole nation's long-term interests. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Republicans, democrats, those who reject hereditary privilege, or anyone the monarchy doesn't represent or actively oppresses. **Classification:** Right Authoritarian **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (10/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★☆☆☆ (Subject to royal authority) - Economic Security: ★★★☆☆ (Royal obligation to subjects) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Royal rule, not democracy) - Social Equality: ★★☆☆☆ (Royal hierarchy) - Innovation/Progress: ★★☆☆☆ (Royal patronage of progress) - Community Solidarity: ★★★☆☆ (Loyalty to crown unifies) **Learn More:** (link: "Monarchism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchism')] **Real World Examples:** * Saudi Arabia * Absolute monarchies (pre-1800s Europe) * Brunei **Fictional Examples:** * Dune by Frank Herbert (imperial houses) * Game of Thrones (various kingdoms) * The Chronicles of Narnia (Aslan's kingdom) [[Start over|Start]]# Nihilist World All political systems are ultimately arbitrary exercises of power. The honest response is to reject all ideologies and social obligations, living authentically without illusions about justice or meaning. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who need meaning, purpose, social connection, or any form of collective organisation to flourish - which is most human beings. **Classification:** Post-Political **Freedom Score:** ★★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ (8/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★★ (Reject all external authority) - Economic Security: ★☆☆☆☆ (Reject security as meaningful) - Democratic Participation: ★☆☆☆☆ (Reject participation as illusion) - Social Equality: ★☆☆☆☆ (Reject equality as meaningful) - Innovation/Progress: ★☆☆☆☆ (Reject progress as meaningful) - Community Solidarity: ★☆☆☆☆ (Reject solidarity as illusion) **Learn More:** (link: "Nihilism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism')] **Real World Examples:** * No sustained examples * Brief periods during societal collapse **Fictional Examples:** * The Road by Cormac McCarthy (moral vacuum) * Fight Club (destruction of meaning) * True Detective (cosmic pessimism) [[Start over|Start]]# Social Liberal World You believe in individual freedom supported by strong institutions. You want regulated markets, robust welfare systems, and protection for vulnerable people, all within a democratic framework that respects individual rights whilst ensuring everyone has genuine opportunities to flourish. **Your utopia won't be utopian for:** Those who want either minimal government interference or maximum economic equality - it's a balance that may satisfy neither pure libertarians nor pure socialists. **Classification:** Centre-Left Liberal **Freedom Score:** ★★★★★★★☆☆☆ (22/30) - Individual Autonomy: ★★★★☆ - Freedom to make personal choices about your life. - Economic Security: ★★★★☆ - Guaranteed access to basic needs (food, shelter, healthcare). - Democratic Participation: ★★★☆☆ - Meaningful say in decisions affecting you. - Social Equality: ★★★★☆ - Equal treatment regardless of background/identity. - Innovation/Progress: ★★★★☆ - Capacity for technological and social advancement. - Community Solidarity: ★★★☆☆ - Social connection and mutual support. **Learn More:** (link: "Liberalism")[(goto-url: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism')] **Real World Examples:** * Canada * Netherlands * Australia **Fictional Examples:** * The West Wing (idealised American liberalism) * Modern Scandinavian crime novels * Parks and Recreation_ (local government optimism) [[Start over|Start]]# The Nihilist Branch You reject both property and organisation - interesting! But if you don't believe in organising society, why organise at all? [[Pure individualism - each person for themselves|Section29]] [[Destroy all systems and see what emerges|Section30]]# Democratic Technology Control You want communities to democratically choose their technology - sensible! But what scale of democracy works best for these complex decisions? [[Small federated communities making their own choices|Section31]] [[Regional democratic councils coordinating|Section32]] [[Large-scale democratic planning is needed|Section11]] [[Ecological limits should guide all technology choices|Section9]]# The Coordination Dilemma You recognise that complex society needs coordination - practical thinking! But what kind of coordination preserves your anti-authority values? [[Democratic councils of workers coordinating|Section33]] [[A workers' state might be needed temporarily|Section18]] [[A revolutionary party should provide leadership|Section19]]# The Green Branch You believe human society must live within ecological limits - wise thinking! But how do we enforce ecological responsibility without destroying freedom? [[Local communities managing their own ecosystems|Section31]] [[Democratic green planning is needed|Section36]] [[Market incentives can solve environmental problems|Section40]] [[Strong eco-authority is necessary|Section46]]# Choosing A Better Future What would a better world look like to you? What would it feature? What would it be free from? What kind of people would be part of it? It can be fun to imagine an ideal vision of the future, and there are probably as many variations of what that looks like as there are people who might try to envision it. Here you will find a series of passages linked by choices that lead to different ideals. It is an imperfect attempt to gauge the kinds of values people have and where those lead as far as political ideologies and their consequences go. You can take this little game as seriously or otherwise as you like. But if you feel I represented any particular side unfairly please let me know what you think I got wrong. My intention is to refine and expand it if others find it interesting or useful. At the very least I hope it gets people thinking, even if they just find it amusing. Click below and on the different choices hereafter to Choose Your Own Utopia: [[Begin your journey|Section1]]